Ashenix vs Be Better Peptides
Ashenix has the higher PepFinder Score (6.5 vs 6.2). Both list 9 of the same peptides. Neither can pay to change the comparison.
| Ashenix | Be Better Peptides | |
|---|---|---|
| PepFinder Score | 6.5 | 6.2 |
| Customer rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Would order again | Needs 5+ reviews | Needs 5+ reviews |
| Product selection | 6.4/10 9 peptides · 10 products | 8.0/10 20 peptides · 27 products |
| Pricing and value | 5.4/10 10% more expensive than average per mg | 6.6/10 9% cheaper than average per mg |
| Delivery | Not rated yet | Not rated yet |
| Payment options | Not rated yet None found | 5.0/10 Card |
| Customer support | 5.0/10 None found yet | 5.0/10 None found yet |
| Website experience | Not rated yet | Not rated yet |
| Reliability | 8.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Packaging | Not rated yet | Not rated yet |
| Ships from | United Kingdom | United Kingdom |
| Ships to | Not stated | Not stated |
| Median price per mg | £3.30 | £2.50 |
The shaded cell is the higher rating in that row. Each rating's source (automated data, customer reviews or editorial) is shown on the supplier's profile.
Testing & transparency (optional detail)
| Ashenix | Be Better Peptides | |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency Score | 4.6Provisional | 4.2Provisional |
| Testing transparency | 4.6 | 6.1 |
| Company transparency | – | 2.7 |
| Documentation | 4.2 | 4.7 |
| Third-party testing stated | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Publishes COAs | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Batch-specific COAs | Not yet assessed | Not yet assessed |
| COAs reviewed by us | 0 | 0 |
| Verification | Not verified | Not verified |
| Company registration | NI742254 | Not published |
| Years tracked | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Refund policy clear | Not yet assessed | Not yet assessed |
Full profiles: Ashenix · Be Better Peptides · add more suppliers
Supplier and market information only; not medical advice.