Editorial policy
Independence
Suppliers cannot pay to change a rating, a ranking position, a review or anything we write. Paid plans and advertising exist, but the code that calculates ratings has no access to commercial data, and automated tests check that it stays that way. How each rating is built is set out in our methodology.
What suppliers can and cannot do
A supplier can claim its profile, reply publicly to reviews, and propose corrections to factual details. It cannot edit any field that feeds a score, remove or edit a review, or see a reviewer’s personal details. Proposed corrections are checked by our team against a source before anything changes; see the corrections policy.
Sources
Supplier information comes from the supplier’s own public website, company registers, regulator notices and documents such as certificates of analysis. Each fact on a profile shows its source and the date we checked it. Research content cites published studies and official sources, linked so readers can check them. We do not publish claims we cannot source.
Health content
Our peptide guides describe what published research found, including the kind of study (cell, animal or human) and its size, and state plainly when evidence is limited. Where we report amounts used in studies, we cite the study; that is a description of research, not advice. Nothing on PepFinder is medical advice, and research peptides are not licensed medicines. See the disclaimer.
Words we do not use
We never describe a supplier or product as “safe”. Verification means a supplier’s business and documentation were checked, nothing more; see the verification policy.
Who writes
Content is written and reviewed by the PepFinder editorial team. Each guide shows the date it was last reviewed. Errors can be reported to editorial@pepfinder.com.