Improved Peptides vs IRON Peptides
IRON Peptides has the higher PepFinder Score (6.4 vs 5.7). Both list 13 of the same peptides. Neither can pay to change the comparison.
| PepFinder Score | 5.7 | 6.4 |
| Trustpilot | 3.8 Trustpilot(2) | No score found |
| Customer rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Would order again | Needs 5+ reviews | Needs 5+ reviews |
| Product selection | 7.1/10 13 peptides · 15 products | 7.8/10 18 peptides · 21 products |
| Pricing and value | 4.1/10 40% more expensive than average per mg | 3.9/10 43% more expensive than average per mg |
| Delivery | Not rated yet | Not rated yet |
| Payment options | 8.5/10 VisaMastercardCardAmerican ExpressPayPalZelleVenmo | Not rated yet None found |
| Customer support | 5.0/10 None found yet | 5.0/10 None found yet |
| Website experience | Not rated yet | Not rated yet |
| Reliability | 5.5/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Packaging | Not rated yet | Not rated yet |
| Ships from | United States | United States |
| Ships to | Not stated | Not stated |
| Median price per mg | US$6.50 | US$8.40 |
The shaded cell is the higher rating in that row. Each rating's source (automated data, customer reviews or editorial) is shown on the supplier's profile.
Testing & transparency (optional detail)
| Transparency Score | 4.2Provisional | 4.3Provisional |
| Testing transparency | 6.1 | – |
| Company transparency | 2.7 | 4.7 |
| Documentation | 3.8 | 3.3 |
| Third-party testing stated | ✓ Yes | Not yet assessed |
| Publishes COAs | ✓ Yes | Not yet assessed |
| Batch-specific COAs | Not yet assessed | Not yet assessed |
| COAs reviewed by us | 0 | 0 |
| Verification | Not verified | Not verified |
| Company registration | Not published | Not published |
| Years tracked | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Refund policy clear | Not yet assessed | Not yet assessed |
Full profiles: Improved Peptides · IRON Peptides · add more suppliers
Supplier and market information only; not medical advice.