The PepFinder editorial team

Who writes and checks what you read here, and the rules they work to.

What the team does

The editorial team writes and maintains the guides, the peptide pages and the news, and reviews every supplier fact, testing document and customer review before it is published. Guides are written from the primary literature and regulators' own publications, with the references listed on each page; peptide pages carry the trial results and regulatory status with citations, and are updated when a regulator or a journal publishes something new.

How a page is checked

Every factual claim about a supplier links to the evidence for it: the page on the supplier's own site, the registry record, or the document we reviewed. The methodology sets out what counts as evidence.
Prices are read from suppliers' own catalogues and validated by rule before they appear; a figure that fails the checks is held, never guessed.
Guides and peptide pages show a “reviewed” date. That is the date a member of the team last read the page against its sources, not a date a script updated.
Corrections come in through the contact page and from suppliers through their dashboards; each one is logged and answered.

What the team will not write

PepFinder gives no guidance on taking peptides: no protocols, no dosing advice, and no claims that a research compound treats anything. Research peptides are not licensed medicines. Where a page describes a dose, it is a published trial's figure with its citation, not a recommendation.

Independence and pay

The team is paid by PepFinder, which earns money as described here: never from a supplier for a rating, a review, a ranking or a line in a guide. Suppliers cannot see or change a page before it goes live. The independence rules apply to every page on the site.

Guides maintained by the team

Questions about a page, or a correction: editorial@pepfinder.com.